Management Review Procedure

The report is the input for the (MR).

The Management review looks at:

a) the status of actions from previous reviews;
b) changes in external and internal issues relevant to food safety management system, including changes in its and its context;
c) information on the performance and effectiveness of the food safety management system, including in;
1) results of the activities for the updating of the system;
2) monitoring results and measuring results;
3) of the results of verification activities in connection with general and specific ;
4) non conformities and corrective measures;
5) results (internal and external);
6) inspections (for , regulations (including Dutch Food Safety Authority), customer);
7) presentation of external providers (suppliers of services and products, outsourced processes);
8) of the risks and opportunities and the effectiveness of the measures taken to address them;
9) to what extent the objectives of the food safety management system have been achieved.
d) the adequacy of the resources;
e) every calamity, incident, or recall that has occurred;
f) relevant information obtained through external and internal communication, including requests and from interested parties;
g) possibilities for continuous improvement.
The data is presented in such a way that top management can relate the information to the stated objectives of the food safety management system. 

Content MR:

In addition to the verification procedure, the management should highlight the following aspects:

General affairs

An overview is given of the past year. What have we achieved, where were our opportunities and pitfalls. And of course what we want to achieve (in outline) as a company in the future. What has been achieved with regard to sustainability and ethics policy. 


The objectives of the past year are discussed and assessed. 

Previous year agreements and improvements

The agreements made and possible improvements that emerged in the previous management review are assessed. If agreements have not been made or objectives have not been achieved, a reason will be given or a cause analysis will be carried out. This is taken into account when determining points for improvement and drafting new agreements and objectives. 

Verification and audits

The verification and internal and external audits are discussed. Points from the verification and the audits that need extra attention are included in this report. 

Hazard study and the prerequisite program

The changes in the study are discussed. The prerequisite program is also assessed. Future changes in the hazard study are discussed and recorded. The effectiveness of the HACCP, plan, and product authenticity is discussed. 

Incidents and performed recalls

It is determined whether recalls have been necessary in the past year. This applies to recalls with and without a notification obligation. 

Machines, tools, and buildings

What investments have been made? 
Which investments will take place in the coming years? 
Have there been any problems? 

Validation (process, product, personnel, means of production)

On the basis of the investment list, it is determined whether all necessary validations have taken place. It is also checked whether the investments have achieved their intended goal.

Customer communication

Are all possible product abnormalities or hazards communicated to customers. This refers to products that were delivered to the customers, complaints from customers, and feedback from customers.


It is determined whether the environment has had a negative impact on our activities. Hazards are looked at, but also nuisance from, for example, noise or vibration. In addition, it is determined whether there are possible changes in the future. 


Have there been any problems with transportation?
Does the transport take place according to agreements made?
What is being done about environmental improvements?


Did large -cale maintenance have to take place?
Has major maintenance been planned?
Has maintenance led to unsafe situations?

Personnel (services)

Are there enough to be able to deliver the desired and safety?
Are the staff provisions sufficient? 
Is the knowledge of the staff sufficient? 
Are courses or training planned?

Layout and workplace safety

Have there been any accidents in the past year?
Have unsafe situations occurred?
Have “near” accidents occurred?
Has there been a health and safety ? If so, what are the findings?

External influences

Which external influences have played a role? This includes a financial crisis, delivery problems, supplier bankruptcy, and etc.. Changes in the context of the organization. 

Customer satisfaction

Are the customers satisfied with the delivered services and products?
Lost relationships, increased sales at existing customers, complaints and delivery errors, visit reports, or contact moments can be used as input. 

Internal and external communication

How has the quality system communicated? Are all objectives known? How did communication taken place with personnel? How does communication with external parties go?


Have there been any problems with allergens? This can be internal but also from the complaints. 
Are all allergens controlled in practice? 
Have new allergens been added? 


Have there been any problems with labels? Internal data and complaints must be consulted for the assessment.
Do all labels comply with legislation and customer requirements?
Are the ingredients, images, and names correct?

Changes that have influence on food safety

Have there been changes in processes, products, materials, or machines that have had an effect on the food safety?

Upcoming years objectives

The verification and management review provide input for setting objectives in the field of food safety and quality. The already planned company * wide objectives are also included in the report. The objectives are linked to departments as much as possible.

From following the management review:

  • New objectives can be set up.\
  • Policy should be adjusted if necessary.
  • Improvements can be implemented that require investment.
  • General improvements can be made. 

A report is drawn up by the quality department of the management review. This report is signed by the management for approval. 
All relevant aspects of the management review are communicated to the staff members through consultation. 


Where relevant, the following points are included in the management review each year:

  • Scientific and technical developments;
  • Industry related codes;
  • New risks arising from information about recalls, authenticity of raw materials, food defense;
  • Relevant legislation (both and country of sale);
  • Changes to standards ().
TwitterFacebookLinkedInPin It

Related articles to Management review: Is there a procedure example?

Many customers and visitors to this page 'Management review: Is there a procedure example?' also viewed the articles and manuals listed below:

We are a Food Tech firm in Food Safety Compliance. Experts in setting up and maintaining Food Safety Systems for companies in the Food Supply Chain. We are dedicated to breaking down the barriers for Transparency and Trust in the Global Food Supply Chain.
In our Partnership Program we would like to work together with (Non)Governmental Organizations, Universities, Multinationals and Food companies.

iMIS Food is a fully equipped Food Safety Compliance platform. Unique is the installation of an iMIS Food server at the Food company, for online and offline availability. The online (no travel costs) iMIS Food implementation process includes 6 to 10 days of support and has a lead time of 3 months.

Monthly iMIS Food Update

Would you also like to receive the monthly iMIS Food Update and be invited to our events? Then please fill in this form.

Food Safety news 6-2024

Example: General terms and conditions of delivery

Hereby we present you an example of the General terms and conditions of delivery to set expectations for your supplier to adhere to certain quality.

The future of food safety, a foresight report by FAO

Hereby a summary of the FAO paper on the future of food safety, a foresight report published in 2022. Read here about the drivers and trends.

Certification Cowboys

The freelance auditors are the certification cowboys of the Food market.